You finally blocked out time to write a blog post. You have the outline, you know the points you want to make, and then it happens: the first paragraph takes forty minutes, the energy drains out of the afternoon, and the draft is still half-finished by dinner. Most coaches don’t have a content problem. They have a drafting problem.
This prompt fixes the drafting part. It takes SEO blog writing for coaches from a dreaded three-hour session down to a focused edit. You hand the AI your outline, your focus keyword, your tone, and the pages on your site you can link to, and it returns a complete, structured, ranking-ready draft with internal link suggestions attached. By the end of this page you’ll also understand why it works, so your next post is even sharper.
When to use this
- You have an outline or a list of points but no time to turn it into full prose.
- You want a blog post that’s actually structured for search, not just a wall of text.
- You’re trying to build internal links between your articles and your services page but keep forgetting to add them.
- You’re repurposing a popular email, a talk, or a coaching framework into a long-form post.
- You want a consistent publishing rhythm without hiring a writer for every piece.
The prompt
Copy this whole block into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini:
You are an expert SEO content writer who specializes in blog articles for coaches. Your job is to turn my outline into a complete, ranking-ready blog post that reads like a human wrote it, not a robot.
Before writing, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear or missing. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- My niche: {{NICHE}}
- Who this post is for: {{IDEAL_READER}}
- The focus keyword I want to rank for: {{FOCUS_KEYWORD}}
- My outline / main points: {{OUTLINE}}
- Target length: {{WORD_COUNT}} words
- My tone: {{TONE}}
- The action I want readers to take at the end: {{CTA}}
- Pages on my site I can link to internally: {{EXISTING_PAGES}}
TASK
Write ONE complete blog post that:
1. Opens with an SEO meta title (<= 60 characters) and a meta description (<= 155 characters), both using the focus keyword.
2. Uses an H1 title and logical H2/H3 subheadings drawn from my outline.
3. Includes the focus keyword naturally in the H1, the first 100 words, at least one H2, and the conclusion. Do not keyword-stuff.
4. Opens the body with a 2-3 sentence hook that names the reader's problem.
5. Uses short paragraphs (2-4 sentences), bullet lists, and concrete examples my ideal reader will recognize.
6. Ends with a conclusion and a soft, natural call to action: {{CTA}}.
INTERNAL LINKS
- Suggest 2-4 places to add internal links using only the pages I listed in {{EXISTING_PAGES}}.
- For each, give the exact anchor text and the sentence it belongs in. Never invent a URL.
CONSTRAINTS
- Hit the target word count within +/- 15%.
- Sound human and match my tone. No corporate buzzwords, no 'in today's fast-paced world', no 'unlock', no 'game-changer'.
- Do not invent statistics, studies, or fake client results. If a claim needs a source, flag it with [verify].
OUTPUT FORMAT
1. Meta title and meta description.
2. The full article in Markdown.
3. A short bulleted list titled 'Suggested internal links' with anchor text + target page + the sentence to place it in.
How to customize it
Replace the eight {{VARIABLES}} before you send it:
| Variable | What to put | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{NICHE}} |
Your specific coaching niche | career coaching for mid-career professionals |
{{IDEAL_READER}} |
The exact person reading the post | people in their 30s and 40s feeling stuck in a job they’ve outgrown |
{{FOCUS_KEYWORD}} |
The phrase you want to rank for | how to know when to leave your job |
{{OUTLINE}} |
Your rough points, numbered | 1. The ‘you’ll just know’ myth. 2. 5 signals. 3. Test it without quitting. 4. A 30-day plan. |
{{WORD_COUNT}} |
Target length in words | 1300 |
{{TONE}} |
How you sound | encouraging, practical, no fluff |
{{CTA}} |
The action you want | book a free 20-minute clarity call |
{{EXISTING_PAGES}} |
Real URLs you can link to | /blog/signs-of-burnout, /blog/career-pivot-guide, /services/1-1-coaching |
The two variables that move the needle most are {{OUTLINE}} and {{EXISTING_PAGES}}. A sharp outline gives the model a real argument to write; a real page list keeps the internal links honest instead of invented.
See it in action (full example)
Here is the exact prompt, filled in for a career coach. This is the whole input, nothing hidden:
You are an expert SEO content writer who specializes in blog articles for coaches. Your job is to turn my outline into a complete, ranking-ready blog post that reads like a human wrote it, not a robot.
Before writing, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear or missing. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- My niche: career coaching for mid-career professionals
- Who this post is for: people in their 30s and 40s feeling stuck in a job they've outgrown
- The focus keyword I want to rank for: how to know when to leave your job
- My outline / main points: 1. The myth that you'll 'just know'. 2. 5 honest signals it's time. 3. How to test the decision without quitting first. 4. A simple 30-day plan.
- Target length: 1300 words
- My tone: encouraging, practical, no fluff
- The action I want readers to take at the end: book a free 20-minute clarity call
- Pages on my site I can link to internally: /blog/signs-of-burnout, /blog/career-pivot-guide, /services/1-1-coaching, /about
TASK
Write ONE complete blog post that:
1. Opens with an SEO meta title (<= 60 characters) and a meta description (<= 155 characters), both using the focus keyword.
2. Uses an H1 title and logical H2/H3 subheadings drawn from my outline.
3. Includes the focus keyword naturally in the H1, the first 100 words, at least one H2, and the conclusion. Do not keyword-stuff.
4. Opens the body with a 2-3 sentence hook that names the reader's problem.
5. Uses short paragraphs (2-4 sentences), bullet lists, and concrete examples my ideal reader will recognize.
6. Ends with a conclusion and a soft, natural call to action: book a free 20-minute clarity call.
INTERNAL LINKS
- Suggest 2-4 places to add internal links using only the pages I listed.
- For each, give the exact anchor text and the sentence it belongs in. Never invent a URL.
CONSTRAINTS
- Hit the target word count within +/- 15%.
- Sound human and match my tone. No corporate buzzwords, no 'in today's fast-paced world', no 'unlock', no 'game-changer'.
- Do not invent statistics, studies, or fake client results. If a claim needs a source, flag it with [verify].
OUTPUT FORMAT
1. Meta title and meta description.
2. The full article in Markdown.
3. A short bulleted list titled 'Suggested internal links' with anchor text + target page + the sentence to place it in.
And here is the complete output the model returns:
Meta title: How to Know When to Leave Your Job: 5 Real Signals
Meta description: Wondering how to know when to leave your job? Here are 5 honest signals, a low-risk way to test the decision, and a 30-day plan to move forward.
How to Know When to Leave Your Job (Without the Guesswork)
You’ve been telling yourself you’ll “just know” when it’s time to leave. But it’s been eighteen months, the Sunday-night dread keeps coming back, and you still can’t tell if you’re genuinely done or just having a rough quarter. Figuring out how to know when to leave your job is rarely a lightning-bolt moment. It’s a decision you can actually reason through.
Let’s take the guesswork out of it.
The myth that you’ll “just know”
The most common advice is also the least useful: “You’ll know when it’s time.” For some people a single bad event makes the choice obvious. For most mid-career professionals, it doesn’t work that way.
What actually happens is slower. The job stops growing you. The good days get rarer. You start fantasizing about a completely different life on your commute. None of those is a siren. Together, they’re a pattern, and patterns are something you can read.
5 honest signals it might be time
Read these as a checklist, not a verdict. One signal is noise. Three or more is a conversation worth having with yourself.
- You’ve stopped learning. You could do the role in your sleep, and no new challenge is coming.
- The values gap is widening. How decisions get made at the top no longer matches what you care about.
- The dread is physical. Sunday nights, Monday mornings, a tight chest before certain meetings. Your body keeps score.
- You’ve quietly checked out. You’re doing the minimum and feeling guilty about it, which is its own kind of exhausting.
- Growth is capped. There’s no realistic next step here in title, pay, or scope, and everyone knows it.
A quick honesty check: if several of these are true and you also feel wrung out most days, you may be dealing with burnout rather than the wrong job. Those are different problems with different fixes, and it’s worth telling them apart before you make a big move.
How to test the decision before you quit
Here’s the part most people skip. You don’t have to choose between “stay miserable” and “quit tomorrow.” You can run small, low-risk tests first.
- Change one thing for 30 days. Renegotiate a responsibility, drop a draining project, or ask for the assignment you actually want. If a small change brings the spark back, you may not need to leave at all.
- Talk to three people doing the work you’re curious about. Not to network, just to find out whether the grass is actually greener.
- Run the numbers. Map your real runway and what a transition would cost. Fear shrinks when it’s on a spreadsheet instead of in your head.
- Write the resignation letter you’ll never send. It’s a surprisingly clear way to find out whether you feel relief or panic.
If the tests confirm it, leaving is no longer a leap in the dark. It’s a planned move.
A simple 30-day plan
You don’t need to overhaul your life this week. You need thirty days of small, deliberate steps.
- Days 1-10: Get honest. Track your energy daily. Note what drains you and what, if anything, still lights you up.
- Days 11-20: Test and explore. Run one of the low-risk experiments above. Have one of the three conversations.
- Days 21-30: Decide and prepare. Choose a direction: stay and renegotiate, or leave and prepare. Then take the first concrete step, whether that’s an updated CV or a calmer conversation with your manager.
By day 30 you won’t have a perfect answer. You’ll have something better: evidence instead of anxiety.
You can know when to leave your job
Knowing how to know when to leave your job isn’t about waiting for certainty to arrive. It’s about reading the signals honestly, testing the decision safely, and giving yourself thirty days to gather real evidence. You’re far more capable of making this call than the dread is letting you believe.
If you’d like a second pair of eyes on your situation, book a free 20-minute clarity call. We’ll look at your signals together and map your next step, no pressure to leave or stay.
Suggested internal links
- Anchor: “dealing with burnout rather than the wrong job” -> Page: /blog/signs-of-burnout -> Sentence: “…you may be dealing with burnout rather than the wrong job.”
- Anchor: “a planned move” -> Page: /blog/career-pivot-guide -> Sentence: “It’s a planned move.”
- Anchor: “book a free 20-minute clarity call” -> Page: /services/1-1-coaching -> Sentence: “If you’d like a second pair of eyes on your situation, book a free 20-minute clarity call.”
That is a structured, on-keyword, ~1,250-word draft with meta tags and three honest internal links. Twenty minutes of editing in your own voice and it’s ready to publish.
Why this works
Four LLM principles are doing the heavy lifting here. Learn them and every prompt you write gets better:
- Role priming. The opening line (“You are an expert SEO content writer who specializes in blog articles for coaches”) tells the model which slice of its training to draw from. “Write me a blog post” pulls the bland average of the internet. “Act as an SEO writer for coaches” pulls the structured, search-aware version. Always assign a role.
- Specificity in, specificity out. The model can only be as specific as your input. A one-line outline produces vague filler; a numbered outline with a real argument produces a real article. The quality of the draft is capped by the quality of your
{{OUTLINE}}and{{IDEAL_READER}}. - Constraints are quality control. The word-count band, the keyword-placement rules, the banned buzzwords, and especially the “never invent a URL” line aren’t decoration. Each one removes a known failure mode. Telling the model what NOT to do, like inventing fake statistics or hallucinating links, is as powerful as telling it what to do. The
[verify]flag turns the model’s biggest weakness, confident guessing, into a visible to-do for you. - Clarifying questions beat guessing. The “ask me up to 3 clarifying questions first” line lets the model fill gaps by asking rather than inventing. When your outline is thin, it will ask instead of padding, and that single instruction is the biggest fix for generic AI writing.
Do this now
- Copy the prompt above into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.
- Replace the eight variables. Spend the most time on your outline and your real page list.
- Send it. If it asks clarifying questions, answer them honestly.
- Edit the draft in your own voice, add the suggested internal links, resolve any
[verify]flags, and publish.
Pro tips
- Give it a real outline, not a topic. Numbered points with a clear argument are the difference between a usable draft and generic filler.
- Paste real URLs only. The internal-link suggestions are only as good as the page list you give it. Keep a saved list of your linkable pages and reuse it every time.
- Always resolve the
[verify]flags. The model will flag claims that need a source. Check them before publishing rather than shipping a confident guess. - Run the SEO title separately. If the meta title or description feels weak, ask: “Give me 5 alternative meta titles under 60 characters using the focus keyword.” Pick the best.
- Keep the clarifying-questions line. It is what stops the model from padding a thin brief and makes the draft sound like you.
0 comments
No comments yet.