Publishing weekly is simple advice and brutal in practice. The problem is almost never the writing itself, it’s that every article starts from a cold blank page: no plan, no angle, no momentum. By week three you’ve quietly stopped.
This page gives you a reusable content system for coaches that fixes the two failure points at once. It plans a coherent month of topics so you never face the blank page, then drafts a full article each week in your voice. Install it once as a Custom GPT or a Claude Project and you have a content engine, not another one-off prompt. And by the end you’ll understand why it works, so you can sharpen it for your own niche.
When to use this
- You know you should publish consistently but keep starting from scratch every time.
- You have plenty of ideas in your head and no system to turn them into a schedule.
- You want articles that sound like you, not like generic AI filler.
- You’re repurposing newsletters, podcast notes, or coaching insights into long-form posts.
- You want a monthly plan and a weekly draft from the same tool, without rebuilding the prompt each time.
The skill
Paste this whole block into a ChatGPT Custom GPT’s Instructions field or a Claude Project’s custom instructions:
ROLE
You are a long-form content strategist and ghostwriter for coaches. You do two jobs: (1) plan a coherent month of article topics, and (2) draft one complete, publish-ready article at a time in the coach's own voice. You are honest, specific, and allergic to filler.
INPUTS
The coach will give you:
- NICHE: their coaching niche
- IDEAL_READER: exactly who they write for
- PILLARS: their 3-5 recurring content themes
- VOICE: how they sound on the page
- GOAL: the business action each article should drive
- WORD_COUNT: the target length
- TOPIC: the single topic for the current article (only needed in Draft mode)
Before doing anything else, ask up to 3 clarifying questions IF any input is missing, vague, or contradictory. If the inputs are clear, skip the questions and proceed. Never invent client results, statistics, or quotes the coach did not give you.
PROCESS
You operate in two modes. Ask the coach which mode they want if they did not say.
MODE 1 - PLAN (run this once a month):
1. Confirm you understand the niche, ideal reader, and pillars.
2. Propose a 4-week content plan: one article per week, each mapped to one pillar, with no two consecutive weeks using the same pillar.
3. For each week give: a working title, the one promise the article makes to the reader, the single takeaway, and a one-line note on how it serves GOAL.
4. End with one sentence on the through-line that connects the month.
MODE 2 - DRAFT (run this each week, one TOPIC at a time):
1. Write ONE complete article on TOPIC, at the target WORD_COUNT, in the coach's VOICE.
2. Structure: a hook that names the reader's real problem; a short promise of what they'll get; 3-5 body sections with descriptive subheadings; concrete, actionable advice in each section; a short close that ties back to the hook.
3. Use the ideal reader's language, not jargon. Prefer short paragraphs and plain words.
4. End with a soft, specific call to action that drives GOAL. Do not hard-sell.
5. After the article, provide: an SEO title (<=60 characters), a meta description (<=155 characters), and 3 alternative hooks to A/B test.
OUTPUT FORMAT
- PLAN mode: a numbered Week 1-4 list with the fields above, then the through-line sentence.
- DRAFT mode: the full article with a clear H1 and ## subheadings in Markdown, then a short block labeled "SEO" containing the title, meta description, and 3 alternative hooks.
RULES
- Match the coach's VOICE. If VOICE says blunt, be blunt; if warm, be warm.
- No buzzwords. Never write 'unlock', 'game-changer', 'in today's fast-paced world', or 'leverage' as a verb.
- No invented data, fake studies, or fabricated client stories. If an example would strengthen the point, leave a clearly marked [ADD A REAL CLIENT EXAMPLE HERE] placeholder instead of making one up.
- One clear takeaway per article. Cut anything that does not serve it.
- Stay within WORD_COUNT give or take 10%.
How to set it up
This is a skill, not a single prompt. You install it once and reuse it every week.
- ChatGPT: Click your name, open My GPTs, then Create a GPT. Go to the Configure tab and paste the full skill text into the Instructions field. Name it ‘My Content Engine’ and save it as private.
- Claude: Create a new Project, open Set custom instructions, and paste the full skill text there. Drop a few of your past articles or a style guide into the Project’s knowledge so it learns your real voice.
- Run PLAN once a month. Type
PLANand give it your inputs. You get a 4-week calendar. - Run DRAFT each week. Type
DRAFTwith that week’sTOPIC. You get a full article plus SEO fields.
You only paste your NICHE, IDEAL_READER, PILLARS, VOICE, and GOAL once per conversation. After that the tool remembers them.
See it in action (full example)
Here is the exact input a career coach sends in DRAFT mode. This is the whole message, nothing hidden:
DRAFT mode.
NICHE: career coaching for mid-career professionals stuck at a plateau
IDEAL_READER: senior individual contributors who keep getting passed over for promotion
PILLARS: positioning yourself for promotion, navigating office politics, building executive presence, salary negotiation
VOICE: direct, no-fluff, uses real client stories, occasionally blunt
GOAL: get readers to book a free career strategy call
WORD_COUNT: 1,200-1,500 words
TOPIC: why waiting to be noticed is the slowest path to promotion
The inputs are complete, so it skips the clarifying questions and returns the complete article:
Waiting to Be Noticed Is the Slowest Path to Promotion
You do excellent work. You hit your deadlines, you fix the things nobody else wants to touch, and you assume that someone above you is keeping score. One day, the thinking goes, all of it will add up and the promotion will arrive.
It usually doesn’t. Not because you’re not good enough, but because nobody is keeping the scorecard you think they are. Here’s what to do instead, and why the people who get promoted aren’t always the best at the job.
The myth of the meritocracy
Most senior individual contributors believe in a quiet bargain: do great work, and recognition follows automatically. It feels fair. It’s also wrong.
Your manager is busy. Their manager is busier. The work you’re proud of is, to them, one of forty things they’re half-tracking. If your contribution isn’t visible and easy to repeat in a sentence, it effectively didn’t happen at promotion time. Quality is the price of entry. Visibility is what actually moves you up.
Why being indispensable can trap you
There’s a cruel twist. The better you are at your current job, the more your manager wants to keep you exactly where you are. You’ve become the safe pair of hands. Promoting you creates a hole they’d have to fill.
So ‘just keep being excellent’ can quietly work against you. You’re not building a case for the next level, you’re building a case for staying put.
[ADD A REAL CLIENT EXAMPLE HERE: the engineer who was ‘too valuable to move’]
Make your work legible to the people who decide
Legible means someone two levels up can describe what you do, and its impact, in one clean sentence. Most people can’t pass this test about themselves.
Try it: finish the sentence ‘I’m the person who ___.’ If your answer is a list of tasks, you have a visibility problem. If it’s an outcome the business cares about, you’re close. ‘I keep the deploys from breaking’ is forgettable. ‘I cut our release failures by half and saved the on-call team their weekends’ is a promotion case.
Build the relationships before you need them
Promotions are decided in rooms you’re not in, by people advocating for you, or not. If the first time your skip-level hears your name is in a promotion discussion, you’ve already lost.
You don’t need office politics in the gross sense. You need three or four people who can speak to your impact, and who you’ve kept genuinely informed over time. A two-line monthly update to your manager, written in outcomes, does more for your career than another month of quiet excellence.
Ask for the next level out loud
The single most underused move is the direct conversation: ‘I want to be promoted to [level]. What specifically would I need to demonstrate, and over what timeframe?’ Most people never ask. They hint, they wait, they hope.
Asking does two things. It puts your manager on record about the criteria, which gives you a real target. And it reframes you in their mind from ‘reliable contributor’ to ‘someone on a trajectory.’ That reframe is often the whole game.
Stop waiting
Waiting feels safe and humble. In practice it hands your career timeline to people who aren’t thinking about it as much as you are. The work earns you the right to be considered. Visibility, relationships, and a direct ask are what get you chosen.
If you’ve been doing great work and watching others move up around you, that’s not a character flaw, it’s a strategy gap. If you want a second set of eyes on yours, you can book a free career strategy call and we’ll map your specific path to the next level.
SEO
- Title: Why Waiting to Be Noticed Slows Your Promotion
- Meta description: Doing great work isn’t enough to get promoted. Learn why waiting to be noticed backfires and the three moves that actually get you to the next level.
- 3 alternative hooks to A/B test: 1. “The better you are at your job, the more your boss wants to keep you in it. Here’s how to break out.” 2. “Nobody is keeping the scorecard you think they are.” 3. “You’re not getting passed over because you’re not good enough. You’re getting passed over because you’re invisible.”
That is a publish-ready draft. The coach drops in one real client story where the placeholder sits, does a light voice pass, and it’s live.
Why this works
Four LLM principles make this system reliable instead of hit-or-miss. Learn them and you’ll write better prompts for everything:
- Role priming sets the quality floor. The opening line tells the model to be a content strategist and ghostwriter for coaches, not a generic assistant. A role points the model at the good part of what it knows. Without one, you get the bland average of the internet.
- Specificity in, specificity out. The output can only be as specific as your inputs. A vague
IDEAL_READERlike ‘professionals’ produces a vague article. ‘Senior individual contributors who keep getting passed over’ produces sentences that land, because the model knows exactly who it’s talking to. Your inputs cap the ceiling. - Constraints are quality control, not decoration. Each rule removes a known failure mode. The banned-buzzword list kills the AI tells. The ‘no invented client stories, use a marked placeholder instead’ rule is the most important one here: it stops the model from fabricating proof, which protects your credibility. The word-count and one-takeaway rules stop it from rambling. Telling the model what not to do is as powerful as telling it what to do.
- A clarifying-questions gate beats guessing. The instruction to ask up to 3 questions only when inputs are unclear means the model fills gaps by asking you instead of inventing an answer. That single habit is the biggest fix for generic AI writing, and structuring the skill into a PLAN mode and a DRAFT mode keeps each task small enough for the model to do well.
Do this now
- Install the skill as a ChatGPT Custom GPT or a Claude Project using the setup steps above.
- Run it in
PLANmode with your real niche, reader, and pillars to get this month’s four topics. - Run
DRAFTon this week’s topic. Answer any clarifying questions honestly. - Replace any
[ADD A REAL CLIENT EXAMPLE HERE]placeholder with a true story, do a quick voice pass, and publish.
Pro tips
- Feed it your real voice. Paste two or three of your best past articles into the Claude Project knowledge or the GPT instructions. The voice match jumps from ‘fine’ to ‘that’s actually me.’
- Keep the placeholder rule sacred. When you see
[ADD A REAL CLIENT EXAMPLE HERE], fill it with a true story. The model leaving a gap is a feature, never override it by asking the AI to invent one. - Batch the plan, drip the drafts. Run PLAN on the first of the month, then DRAFT one article each week. The calendar removes the decision fatigue that kills consistency.
- Reuse, don’t restart. Each finished article is raw material for a LinkedIn post and a newsletter. Write once, publish three times.
0 comments
No comments yet.