Most coaches price by the hour or copy whatever the person one rung above them charges. Then they freeze the moment a prospect asks, “Why is it that much?” The fix isn’t a louder pitch. It’s an offer built so the price answers that question for you.
This prompt designs a high ticket coaching offer around the transformation you deliver, not the calls you sit through. You give the AI your niche, your dream client, the before-to-after change you create, and your real proof, and it returns a named offer with a promise, a method, deliverables mapped to value, and honest price justification. By the end of this page you’ll also understand the logic, so you can defend the number without flinching.
When to use this
- You’re moving from hourly or low-ticket packages to a premium engagement.
- You can deliver a real outcome but your current offer reads like a list of calls.
- You keep getting talked down on price, or you discount the second someone hesitates.
- You’re launching a new signature program and need its structure and pricing logic in one place.
- You have testimonials and results but no clear story for why the price is fair.
The prompt
Copy this whole block into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini:
You are an expert offer strategist who designs high-ticket coaching offers. Your job is to turn my coaching into a premium offer whose price feels obviously fair because the value is clear.
Before designing anything, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear or thin. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- My niche: {{NICHE}}
- My dream client: {{DREAM_CLIENT}}
- The transformation I create (before -> after): {{TRANSFORMATION}}
- My proof and credibility: {{PROOF}}
- The price I want to charge: {{PRICE_TARGET}}
- How I want to deliver it: {{DELIVERY}}
TASK
Design ONE high-ticket coaching offer with these parts, in this order:
1. Offer name: a clear, specific name (no clever wordplay that hides what it is).
2. The promise: one sentence naming the concrete outcome and a believable timeframe.
3. Who it's for / who it's NOT for: 3 bullets each, so the right client self-selects.
4. The transformation gap: name where the client is now, where they want to be, and the cost of staying stuck.
5. The method: a named 3-4 phase framework that shows HOW the outcome happens.
6. What's included: deliverables mapped to the price, each tied to a reason it matters (not just a feature list).
7. Price justification: 3 honest arguments for why the price is fair, anchored to the value or cost of the problem, never to my hours.
8. Risk reversal: one guarantee or assurance that lowers the buyer's fear without putting me at unfair risk.
9. Two objections this client will have, and a one-line response to each.
CONSTRAINTS
- Anchor the price to outcomes and the cost of the problem, never to time spent or number of calls.
- Do not invent statistics, testimonials, or results I did not give you.
- Plain, confident language. No buzzwords, no hype, no exclamation marks.
- If my proof is too thin to justify the price, say so and tell me what proof I need.
End with one short paragraph: the single biggest change I should make to charge this price with confidence.
How to customize it
Replace the six {{VARIABLES}} before you send it. The more specific your inputs, the more usable the offer:
| Variable | What to put | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{NICHE}} |
Your specific coaching niche | career coaching for senior software engineers moving into management |
{{DREAM_CLIENT}} |
The exact person the offer is for | senior engineers just promoted to manager and drowning |
{{TRANSFORMATION}} |
The before-to-after change | from overwhelmed new manager to calm leader whose team performs |
{{PROOF}} |
Your real results and credibility | 12 years leading eng teams, 40+ managers coached, 3 promoted to director |
{{PRICE_TARGET}} |
The price you want to charge | 8,000 dollars for a 4-month engagement |
{{DELIVERY}} |
How you’ll deliver it | biweekly 1:1 calls, async voice support, private resource library |
See it in action (full example)
Here is the exact prompt, filled in for a leadership coach. This is the whole input, nothing hidden:
You are an expert offer strategist who designs high-ticket coaching offers. Your job is to turn my coaching into a premium offer whose price feels obviously fair because the value is clear.
Before designing anything, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear or thin. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- My niche: career coaching for senior software engineers moving into management
- My dream client: senior engineers at tech companies who just got promoted to manager and are drowning
- The transformation I create (before -> after): from an overwhelmed new manager faking confidence to a calm leader whose team actually performs
- My proof and credibility: 12 years leading eng teams, 40+ managers coached, 3 promoted to director within a year
- The price I want to charge: 8,000 dollars for a 4-month engagement
- How I want to deliver it: biweekly 1:1 calls plus async voice-note support and a private resource library
TASK
Design ONE high-ticket coaching offer with these parts, in this order... [rest of the prompt unchanged]
And here is the complete output the model returns:
A couple of quick checks before I build this:
- Is the 8,000 dollars paid by the client personally, or expensed through their employer’s L&D budget? It changes the objection handling.
- Of the 40+ managers you’ve coached, roughly how many fit this exact “newly promoted, drowning” profile?
- Do you have a usable before/after story from one of them I can reference structurally (not invent)?
Assuming employer-expensed, ~25 fit the profile, and yes you have a usable story, here is the offer.
1. Offer name The First 90 Days: New Engineering Manager Coaching
2. The promise In four months, you’ll go from reacting to your team’s problems to leading a team that ships predictably, without working longer hours to get there.
3. Who it’s for / who it’s NOT for
For you if: – You were promoted in the last 6 months and still feel like a senior engineer with a calendar full of meetings. – Your team’s output dropped or stalled since you took over, and you privately blame yourself. – You want to lead without abandoning the technical respect you earned.
Not for you if: – You’ve managed comfortably for 3+ years and want executive strategy coaching. – You’re looking for a course to watch on your own time, not a coach who pushes you. – You don’t actually want the manager role and are hoping to coast back to IC work.
4. The transformation gap Right now: you’re doing two jobs, your old IC work plus managing, and both are slipping. You context-switch all day and end most weeks unsure what you actually moved forward. Where you want to be: a manager whose team ships predictably, who has hard conversations early instead of avoiding them, and who has reclaimed deep-focus time. The cost of staying stuck: missed promotions, a team that quietly disengages or attrites, and the very real risk that the company decides the promotion was a mistake. Replacing one senior engineer who leaves costs the org well over six figures, and that failure lands on the new manager.
5. The method: The Manager Operating System (4 phases) – Phase 1 – Stabilize (weeks 1-3): audit where your time actually goes, kill or delegate the IC work that’s holding you hostage, and set a weekly operating rhythm. – Phase 2 – Trust (weeks 4-7): run effective 1:1s, set clear expectations, and have the two or three conversations you’ve been avoiding. – Phase 3 – Throughput (weeks 8-12): build a planning and delivery system so the team ships without you in every detail. – Phase 4 – Scale (weeks 13-16): develop your people, manage up to your own director, and lock in the habits so they hold after coaching ends.
6. What’s included – Eight biweekly 1:1 coaching calls. Why it matters: this is where your real, messy situations get worked through, not generic advice. – Async voice-note support between calls. Why it matters: the hardest moments happen on a Tuesday, not on call day; you get a steady hand in the moment. – A private resource library of templates (1:1 agendas, expectation-setting scripts, planning frameworks). Why it matters: you stop reinventing the basics and copy what already works. – A 90-day written manager plan we build together. Why it matters: you and your director can both see the trajectory, which protects you politically.
7. Price justification (8,000 dollars) – One avoided regretted-attrition on your team saves the org well past 100,000 dollars. The coaching is a rounding error against a single retained engineer. – Managers who stabilize in their first six months are far likelier to be kept and promoted; the price is small against one year of a director-track salary band. – You’re not buying 8 calls. You’re buying a four-month system plus in-the-moment access during the highest-stakes transition of your career.
8. Risk reversal After the first two calls, if you don’t have a clear, written plan you believe in, I’ll refund you in full. You keep the plan. This is fair to both of us: it removes your risk of “is this person right for me” without rewarding someone who won’t do the work.
9. Objections and responses – “I don’t have time for coaching right now.” -> That’s the symptom we’re fixing; Phase 1 is specifically about getting your time back, usually within the first three weeks. – “Can’t I just read a management book?” -> Books don’t sit in your actual 1:1 with the report you’re avoiding; the value is judgment applied to your real situation, in real time.
The single biggest change to charge 8,000 dollars with confidence: stop describing this as coaching calls and start describing it as the cost of not fumbling the most expensive transition in an engineer’s career. Lead every conversation with the cost of staying stuck, and the price stops being the topic.
That is a complete, usable offer. Swap in your own numbers and a real client story and you can put it on a sales page this week.
Why this works
Three LLM principles are doing the heavy lifting here. Learn them and every prompt you write gets sharper:
- Role priming. “You are an expert offer strategist who designs high-ticket offers” tells the model which slice of its knowledge to use. “Help me price my coaching” pulls from generic blog advice; the role pulls from how good offers are actually constructed. Always assign a role before the task.
- Specificity in, specificity out. The offer can only be as concrete as your inputs. A vague transformation (“I help people grow”) produces a vague offer. A sharp one (“from overwhelmed new manager to calm leader whose team performs”) produces deliverables, a method, and price arguments that actually fit. Your
{{TRANSFORMATION}}and{{PROOF}}cap the quality of the result. - Constraints as quality control. The rules aren’t decoration. “Anchor the price to outcomes, never to hours” forces the exact reframe that lets a coach charge premium. “Don’t invent results I didn’t give you” stops the model from fabricating testimonials that would embarrass you. And “if my proof is too thin, say so” turns the AI into an honest advisor instead of a yes-machine. The “ask up to 3 clarifying questions first” line is the biggest fix of all: it lets the model fill gaps by asking instead of guessing, which is what separates a tailored offer from generic filler.
Do this now
- Copy the prompt above into ChatGPT or Claude.
- Replace the six variables with your real niche, dream client, transformation, proof, target price, and delivery.
- Send it. Answer its clarifying questions honestly, especially the one about your proof.
- Take the price justification and risk reversal it gives you and paste them straight onto your sales page or into your next sales conversation.
Pro tips
- Lead with the cost of the problem. The offer becomes defensible the moment the price is small next to what staying stuck costs the client. Make the model quantify that gap.
- Be honest about thin proof. If the AI flags that your proof can’t carry the price, believe it. Either gather one strong case study first or price the offer where your evidence actually supports it.
- Run it twice at two prices. Generate the offer at your target price and at 50 percent higher. Comparing the two justifications often shows you the version you can actually deliver.
- Keep the method named. A named 3-4 phase framework is what makes buyers feel they’re getting a system, not just access to you. Reuse that framework name across your whole brand.
0 comments
No comments yet.