Your draft isn’t bad. That’s the trap. It’s clear enough to send, so you send it, even though it’s twenty percent too long, a little stiff, and sprinkled with words your clients would never say out loud. Editing for coaches is rarely about fixing mistakes. It’s about cutting the fat, clearing the jargon, and keeping the human voice that made someone want to work with you in the first place.
This prompt turns the AI into a line editor that does exactly that, and then tells you what it changed and why. You give it your draft, your reader, and the voice you want to protect. It hands back a tighter version, a list of every edit, and an honest note about the calls only you can make. By the end of this page you’ll also understand the editing principles behind it, so you start catching this stuff yourself.
When to use this
- You wrote a sales page, email, or About section and it feels longer and stiffer than how you actually talk.
- You catch yourself using words like ‘transformational journey’ or ‘unlock your potential’ and you’re sick of them.
- A client or peer said your copy was ‘a bit much’ and you can’t see where.
- You want a second set of eyes before something goes live, without paying for a human editor every time.
- You’re repurposing old copy and need it tightened, not rewritten from scratch.
The prompt
Copy this whole block into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini:
You are a sharp line editor who specializes in copy for coaches. Your job is to make my writing clearer, tighter, and more human without changing my meaning or stripping out my voice.
Before editing, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- Who will read this: {{AUDIENCE}}
- What this copy should do: {{PURPOSE}}
- The voice I want to keep: {{VOICE}}
- Words or phrases you must NOT change: {{KEEP}}
DRAFT TO EDIT
{{DRAFT}}
TASK
1. Return a cleanly edited version of my draft.
2. Cut filler, hedging, and repetition. Prefer short sentences and plain words.
3. Replace coaching jargon and abstract claims with concrete language my reader actually uses. Examples of jargon to hunt: 'unlock', 'level up', 'holistic', 'transformational journey', 'limiting beliefs', 'show up as your best self', 'in today's fast-paced world'.
4. Keep my voice and any phrase listed under KEEP exactly as written.
5. Do not add new claims, statistics, or client results I did not write.
FORMAT
- First: the edited version, ready to paste.
- Then a section called WHAT I CHANGED with 4-6 bullets, each naming the specific edit and why (e.g. 'cut "in order to" to "to" - tighter').
- Then a section called STILL UP TO YOU with 1-3 honest flags where only I can decide (a claim I should verify, a vague benefit I should make specific, a place the tone choice is mine).
- Keep the edit roughly the same length or shorter than my draft, never longer.
How to customize it
Replace the five {{VARIABLES}} before you send it:
| Variable | What to put | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{AUDIENCE}} |
The specific person reading it | busy founders who think coaching is fluffy |
{{PURPOSE}} |
The one job the copy must do | get them to book a free intro call |
{{VOICE}} |
How you want to sound | warm, plain-spoken, lightly direct |
{{KEEP}} |
Phrases the editor must not touch | my signature method name, the word ‘practice’ |
{{DRAFT}} |
The full text to edit | paste your sales page, email, or About section |
The {{KEEP}} field matters more than it looks. It’s how you stop an over-eager editor from flattening the one phrase that makes your brand sound like you.
See it in action (full example)
Here is the exact prompt, filled in for a leadership coach editing her About page. This is the whole input, nothing hidden:
You are a sharp line editor who specializes in copy for coaches. Your job is to make my writing clearer, tighter, and more human without changing my meaning or stripping out my voice.
Before editing, ask me up to 3 clarifying questions if anything below is unclear. Otherwise, proceed.
CONTEXT
- Who will read this: busy founders who think coaching is fluffy
- What this copy should do: get them to book a free intro call
- The voice I want to keep: warm, plain-spoken, lightly direct
- Words or phrases you must NOT change: 'the Steady Founder Method'
DRAFT TO EDIT
In today's fast-paced business world, founders are constantly being pulled in a million different directions. As a holistic leadership coach, I help ambitious entrepreneurs unlock their full potential and show up as their best selves so that they can finally break through the limiting beliefs that are holding them back on their transformational leadership journey. Through the Steady Founder Method, we will work together collaboratively in order to create lasting, sustainable change that empowers you to lead with confidence, clarity, and purpose. If this resonates with you, I would absolutely love for you to consider potentially booking a complimentary discovery call with me today.
TASK
1. Return a cleanly edited version of my draft.
2. Cut filler, hedging, and repetition. Prefer short sentences and plain words.
3. Replace coaching jargon and abstract claims with concrete language my reader actually uses. Examples of jargon to hunt: 'unlock', 'level up', 'holistic', 'transformational journey', 'limiting beliefs', 'show up as your best self', 'in today's fast-paced world'.
4. Keep my voice and any phrase listed under KEEP exactly as written.
5. Do not add new claims, statistics, or client results I did not write.
FORMAT
- First: the edited version, ready to paste.
- Then a section called WHAT I CHANGED with 4-6 bullets, each naming the specific edit and why (e.g. 'cut "in order to" to "to" - tighter').
- Then a section called STILL UP TO YOU with 1-3 honest flags where only I can decide (a claim I should verify, a vague benefit I should make specific, a place the tone choice is mine).
- Keep the edit roughly the same length or shorter than my draft, never longer.
And here is the complete output the model returns:
Edited version:
Most founders I work with aren’t short on drive. They’re short on a way to lead without running themselves into the ground.
I coach founders on exactly that. Using the Steady Founder Method, we turn the scattered, reactive way you’re leading now into a calmer, steadier rhythm, so decisions get easier and your team stops waiting on you for everything.
No personality transplant. Just clearer thinking and habits that hold up under pressure.
If that sounds like what you need, book a free intro call.
WHAT I CHANGED – Cut the opening cliche ‘In today’s fast-paced business world’ entirely and replaced it with a concrete observation about your reader, since founders who think coaching is fluffy switch off at the first cliche. – Removed the jargon stack ‘unlock their full potential’, ‘show up as their best selves’, ‘limiting beliefs’, and ‘transformational leadership journey’ and swapped in plain outcomes: easier decisions, a team that doesn’t wait on you. – Tightened ‘in order to’ to ‘to’ and deleted doubled-up words like ‘lasting, sustainable’ and ‘confidence, clarity, and purpose’ that say the same thing three ways. – Cut the hedging in the call to action (‘I would absolutely love for you to consider potentially booking’) down to a direct ‘book a free intro call’, which matches your direct voice and your goal. – Kept ‘the Steady Founder Method’ exactly as written, per your instructions. – Added the line ‘No personality transplant’ to reassure skeptical founders without adding any claim about results.
STILL UP TO YOU – I wrote that your method makes ‘your team stops waiting on you for everything’. That’s a specific promise. Make sure it’s true to how you actually coach before you publish it. – ‘Calmer, steadier rhythm’ is still a little soft. If you have one concrete before/after a client experienced, dropping it in here would land harder. Only you have that story.
The draft went from 118 words of mush to a tight version a skeptical founder might actually finish reading, and the editor flagged the two spots where only the coach can supply the truth. That’s the whole point.
Why this works
Three principles make this prompt produce a useful edit instead of a generic rewrite. Learn them and you’ll prompt better and write better:
- Role priming narrows the model’s instincts. ‘You are a sharp line editor who specializes in copy for coaches’ tells the model to behave like an editor, not a co-author. A vague ‘improve this’ invites it to rewrite everything in its own bland voice. Naming the role, and the niche, pulls answers from the part of its training that knows what tight coaching copy sounds like.
- Constraints are the quality control. The numbered rules each kill a known failure mode. ‘Keep my voice and the KEEP phrases’ stops voice-flattening. ‘Do not add claims I didn’t write’ stops the model from inventing client results, which is the most dangerous thing an AI editor does. ‘Same length or shorter’ stops it from padding. Telling the model what NOT to do is as powerful as telling it what to do.
- A built-in review step makes the output honest. The WHAT I CHANGED and STILL UP TO YOU sections force the model to justify its edits and admit what it can’t decide for you. This is specificity-in, specificity-out applied to feedback: instead of a silent rewrite you have to re-check line by line, you get a transparent diff. And the ‘ask up to 3 clarifying questions first’ line lets it fill gaps by asking instead of guessing, the single biggest fix for generic AI editing.
Do this now
- Copy the prompt above into ChatGPT or Claude.
- Fill in your audience, purpose, voice, the phrases to protect, and paste your real draft.
- Send it. If it asks clarifying questions, answer them honestly.
- Read the WHAT I CHANGED list before you accept anything, then handle the STILL UP TO YOU flags in your own words. Publish.
Pro tips
- Always fill in
{{KEEP}}. List your method name, signature phrases, and any word that’s part of your brand. It’s the difference between an edit that sounds like you and one that sounds like a template. - Edit one piece at a time. Paste a single email or section, not your whole website. The editor stays sharper on a focused chunk.
- Push back. If an edit loses something you liked, reply ‘keep the original line about X but apply the rest’. Editing is a conversation, not a one-shot.
- Read the flags first. The STILL UP TO YOU section is where the real value hides. It points you to the vague benefits and unverified claims that a human editor would charge you to catch.
0 comments
No comments yet.